It's probably not simply a case of Lovecraft mixing up his Arabic.
You can look upon Lovecraft's 'Abdul Alhazred' as the later medieval form of the name. Note on Abdul Alhazred: though such a form of the name would not be found in the original Arabic, in later medieval translations of the text (into Latin, etc.) you would expect the proper form of the name to be corrupted, as they pretty much invariably were corrupted in other Arab name cases. Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. But "Abdul Alhazred" means "Servant of the the thing which is to come" I won't edit it myself because it'd be better for a native speaker to explain.Īlso, is an encyclopedia really the place for criticizing Christianity? I thought it's supposed to pretend to be objective.ġ28.220.29.161 ( talk) 20:30, 23 August 2004Īn automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Abdul_Alhazred article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience. Lovecraft didn't know enough about Arabic names to know that abdul is really abd-al = "servant of the" so abd-al-hazred would be "Servant of hazred" hazred="that which is coming" I think. The reason why he should be called Abdul Hazred should be explained. I think we should care because sjc does and because people care to read it, but please do tell us more about this fascinating Abdul Alhazred-character (seems like some archetype pre-renaissance arab scientist) Sjc ( talk) 20:49, 11 July 2001 Because they are incapable of discerning the difference between fact and fantasy. Lovecraft or Alhazred? Also, why should we care at all about Abdul Alhazred?īecause a lot of people think he may have existed, and probably for the same sorts of reasons some other misguided folk might be interested in the improbable activities of the likes of J Christ esq. Who is purported to be the author of the book mentioned, H. What was the invisible creature supposed to be? A shoggoth? One of those half-children of Yog-Sothoth? I never figured that out. Alhazred was created at least 70 years ago, if not longer in Lovecraft's head.
#Mad abdul alhazred necronomicon movie#
83.254.52.177 ( talk) 00:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Īll of this info about Abdul Alhazred sounds like it was created by an advertising agency to create buzz for a movie that premiered a trailer at the Transformers movie. The article should be changed accordingly. Thus, the form "Mad Arab" does not ccur at all in Lovecraft, whereas "mad Arab" does.
Hence The "M" should always be capitalised as Lovecraft's work uses the word not as insult or description but as a title and "Mad Arab" can be used as a synonym for Abdul Alhazred.Īctually, in the corrected Arkham House editions of Lovecraft's works (based on original manuscripts and early publications), the "m" is not capitalised even once. The only exception to this is The Nameless City and this is when the idea of the Necronomicon and that which was to become the Cthulhu Mythos was still in the earliest stages of development. In Lovecraft's tales the usage of "Mad Arab" is almost always capitalised as a proper noun and quotes should reflect this. I'm too lazy to find the original link, so could someone else? -Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.214.138.218 ( talk) 23:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Mad Arab Someone redirected the link meant to give information on Lovecraft's ancestry to a NYTimes article on trolls. As apposed to bickering rhetoric like wee kids hereĪ fair collection of "Dee's" works sort the chaff, harvest the wheat, post the truth or go fix the page for Peer review one is wrong
0 kommentar(er)
